Daily Poll 7/12/2011

Started by PMEL, 07-12-2011 -- 04:54:25

Previous topic - Next topic

Do you use Flexible Standards in Met/Cal?

Yes
4 (28.6%)
No
3 (21.4%)
What's Flexible Standards?
7 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 14

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

PMEL

07-12-2011 -- 04:54:25
Depending on how people respond to using Flexible Standards I will make a post on how to use them somewhat efficiently.
Hey Nani Nani Cho Cho Cho, Hey Nani Nani Cho!

USMCPMEL

#1
07-12-2011 -- 08:14:13
I have tried to vote the last 2 days and it does not seem to register...

USMCPMEL

#2
07-12-2011 -- 08:16:38
Lol never mind got it. Clicked view results instead of submit vote...

Hawaii596

#3
07-12-2011 -- 13:11:42
I know about flexible standards in Surecal.  How do you use flexible standards in MetCal?
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind."
Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)
from lecture to the Institute of Civil Engineers, 3 May 1883

PMEL

#4
07-12-2011 -- 13:36:30 Last Edit: 07-12-2011 -- 17:04:27 by PMEL
That is the thing you don't very well. That is why I am asking to see if there is any interest.

This is a bad post ok let's try again. Fluke has implemented flexible standard into Met/Cal. It is poorly done but can be used with some success. It will take me a while to make a write up. I don't want to do it if no one is interested.   
Hey Nani Nani Cho Cho Cho, Hey Nani Nani Cho!

USMCPMEL

#5
07-12-2011 -- 16:59:29
Sorry... but your last post did not make sense did you miss a few important words maybe? Not trying to be rude just asking.

PMEL

#6
07-12-2011 -- 17:06:53
I fixed my very bad last post.
Hey Nani Nani Cho Cho Cho, Hey Nani Nani Cho!

Hawaii596

#7
07-13-2011 -- 09:52:06
We use some Surecal, and have a lot of MetCal procedures.  Many of the MetCal procedures were developed elsewhere and aren't a good match to instruments we have in lab.  And........ we are trying to expand our use of automation.  so I'd definitely like to hear about flexible standards.  And I did just now look to verify... we have version 7.1.  Don't know how much difference that makes.  But I would like to hear about how to implement flexible standards in MetCal.
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind."
Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)
from lecture to the Institute of Civil Engineers, 3 May 1883

PMEL

#8
07-13-2011 -- 10:06:11
Flexiable standards came out in 7.2x sorry.
Hey Nani Nani Cho Cho Cho, Hey Nani Nani Cho!

skidaddle skaduski

#9
07-15-2011 -- 11:51:00
I read a short paper by fluke on how to utilize flexible standards, however it seemed that a knowledge of met track was required... i think, I can't remember.  It would be interesting to read your write up, that is, if you feel like it, heh.

It was my understanding that the code did not have to be changed much, if at all.  This worked especially well when substituting equipment with another from the same family and similiar commands?

USMCPMEL

#10
07-15-2011 -- 14:29:23
Is it just me or did PMEL change his name to skidaddle skaduski and start making more random posts?

Hoopty

#11
07-15-2011 -- 21:29:44
Please don't harass legitimate users with legitimate interest in legitimate PMEL related areas.

Thanks.
There are only 10 types of people in this world.  Those who understand binary, and those who don't.   :wink:
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions